I mentioned my experience with Shopify merchants that controlled their own search quality. They manually outperformed our best algorithms.

The average Shopify store is a specific case:

  • A handful of popular queries drive outsized sales
  • Catalogs tend to be smaller
  • Sellers create new products in niche domains

Contrast this with the general Amazon-like megastore

  • billions of unique queries
  • long tail queries
  • huge catalog
  • catalog constantly changes
  • generic products

Is search management useful here?

Yes but focused on:

  • Edge cases - the places general search models fail
  • Head queries - very popular queries that absolutely must give right answers
  • Not mapping queries to products, but instead mapping to attributes of the ideal product (a category, an image embedding, etc) to ensure they stay general
  • Vigilant measurement - the increased user traffic makes it more plausible to measure the impact of rules
  • Retiring agressively - force teams to frequently review every instantiation of a manual intervention in search at some period

In this way, you’re patching the important problems, but watching it like a hawk

-Doug

This is part of Doug’s Daily Search tips - subscribe here


Enjoy softwaredoug in training course form!

Starting June 22!

I hope you join me at Cheat at Search with LLMs to learn how to apply LLMs to search applications. Check out this post for a sneak preview.

Doug Turnbull

More from Doug
Twitter | LinkedIn | Newsletter | Bsky
Take My New Course - Cheat at Search with LLMs